GTP
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 9,834
- Location
- Adelaide, Australia
That is a good thing!So far have never shot it at anyone, which is a good thing.

That is a good thing!So far have never shot it at anyone, which is a good thing.
The government offered a "buyback" scheme for legitimate gun owners, as well as an amnesty on handing in unregistered/unlicensed firearms. It worked very well, as there were millions of guns destroyed!Makes sense, but how did they get all the guns back from the people?
The only "legal" hand guns were those carried by Police and (some) authorised Security people.it was illegal for Australians to own handguns without a permit, and you needed a really, really good reason to get a permit.
In Australia, you would be in enough trouble for having the gun let alone shooting someone with it lolSo if I understand this correctly, you would not use a firearm to defend yourself against an attacker that means to cause grave bodily injury or death to you or a loved one?
Oh, THAT Phil Collins!He said "would you respect me, if I didn't have this gun?" 'Cause, without it, I'm nothin' and that's why I carry one!"
Phil Collins
The government offered a "buyback" scheme for legitimate gun owners, as well as an amnesty on handing in unregistered/unlicensed firearms. It worked very well, as there were millions of guns destroyed!
In Australia, you would be in enough trouble for having the gun let alone shooting someone with it lol
Many of us here in the States think that we are responsible for our own safety and we don't need the Government to provide that for us. Nor are they obligated to either. Many court decisions have ruled that the police are not obligated to protect you.
In Australia, you would be in enough trouble for having the gun let alone shooting someone with it lol
OOWWWCH!! Haha!fired his pistol into his testicle..wrong weapon
ROTFLMAO!the police are not obligated to protect you. They are there mostly to draw the outline of your body and conduct the investigation into your homicide should you chose not to defend yourself or are not very good at it.
So they lied?Many court decisions have ruled that the police are not obligated to protect you.
The only guy I've ever known is a licensed armourer who supplies firearms for film and TVThe only "legal" hand guns were those carried by Police and (some) authorised Security people.
You could also (at one time) legally own a handgun if you were a registered member of an incorporated Gun Club, although the pistol was never allowed to leave the Gun Club!
I'm not sure if this is still the case?
The problem is criminals now own guns still are they going to hand their weapons in dont think so. Was an incident the other day some fool in his car reached into his pocket to get a lighter for a cigi and fired his pistol into his testicle..wrong weapon
http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/o...g-crime-spree-court-told-20160927-grpjqz.html
Middle Eastern crime gangs of course...
Personally I dont see the need to own a .50 Calibre rifle or high powered assault rifles, but thats my opinion.