Rocco
Active Member
- Reaction score
- 68
- Location
- Wyoming, USA
While we're throwing YouTube videos around as a "source," here then: http://youtu.be/8QjZY3WiO9s
I know, more liberuh propoganduh. Save your breath. (No, really).
However, you may like this. I disagree with most of it, but:
"A balanced approach to gun control in the United States would require the warring sides to agree on several contentious issues. Conservative gun-rights advocates should acknowledge that if more states had stringent universal background checks—or if a federal law put these in place—more guns would be kept out of the hands of criminals and the dangerously mentally unstable. They should also acknowledge that requiring background checks on buyers at gun shows would not represent a threat to the Constitution. “The NRA position on this is a fiction,” says Dan Gross, the head of the Brady Campaign. “Universal background checks are not an infringement on our Second Amendment rights. This is black-helicopter stuff.” Gross believes that closing the gun-show loophole would be both extremely effective and a politically moderate and achievable goal. The gun lobby must also agree that concealed-carry permits should be granted only to people who pass rigorous criminal checks, as well as thorough training-and-safety courses."
As much as I hate most gun control suggestions, I strongly believe that gun shows should require a background check be done, persuant to state law. They may not sell as much, but pre-registration/background check BEFORE the show started would alleviate some of that. When I say state law, I want to still be able to produce my concealed carry permit and walk out with whatever gun I wish, just as I can at ANY place that sells guns in Wyoming. (Note, if I go to Colorado, I still have the waiting period.)
As I said in the first post, I teach courses on CC. However, when I carry, I carry openly. It is right there on my hip where the whole world can see it. A lot of people in Wyoming open carry. I think open carry is a lot more of a deterrent to crime than concealed carry is. If you are a criminal (even most crazies), if you looked around and saw 10 people with holsters, would you rather attack there, or where there are no visible guns? A point somebody brought up earlier, that goes with this is, how many mass gun shootings have happened at a police station?
I still strongly believe in the right to carry. However, I believe strongly that anyone who owns a gun needs to have good training. Safety. If you are required to attend anger management class for any reason, you should lose the right to carry. I also think a psychologist should be able to, and required to, submit that you have mental problems to the state. Let that decision be appeal-able to the state medical board. If a psychologist is found to be reporting a lot of false positives because of political, and not true concern for the people, then let him lose his license.
But require training to own a gun. If you have a child, they should be learning basic gun safety at age 5, whether you own a gun or not. My guns are locked up. I cannot promise that every house my daughter goes to the guns will be locked up. I want her to know what to do in that situation. (One of her friends, she is no longer allowed to go over there because she said they had a gun on their kitchen table. When I asked the dad, he said yes, it is loaded, and they do not own anything to lock it up... He should lose custody, or at the very least, the right to own a gun.) If some child who knew nothing about guns saw that, can you imagine the horrors that could have resulted? That is enough to give me nightmares.
Edit: OK, it does happen, lol, but umm, not successfully....
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/11/11/suspect-dead-officer-wounded-in-shooting-at-michigan-police-station/
http://www.rightwingnews.com/videos/detroit-police-station-shooting-video-shows-bravery-was-on-duty/
Now imagine taking the guns away from those cops. How many would have survived then? Would he have been stopped?