ElementalWindX
Member
- Reaction score
- 11
Wondering how many of you guys actually use and trust the new windows server backup on 2008+ servers.
Yes...although I prefer storagecraft...I have some clients with basic simple networks that I utilize the native backup.
I've used NTBackup a lot in older servers too...03, 00. In all honesty I find it more reliable than some of the 3rd party solutions like Symantsuck Bloatup..I mean...Backup Exec.
Yes...although I prefer storagecraft...I have some clients with basic simple networks that I utilize the native backup.
I've used NTBackup a lot in older servers too...03, 00. In all honesty I find it more reliable than some of the 3rd party solutions like Symantsuck Bloatup..I mean...Backup Exec.
I always heard it called fuckup exec. (sorry...)
I use Backup Assist which is a shell that runs on top of the native Windows Backup system.
I just recently gave it a try, trying to use a schtask weekly backup and I could not get it to work.
START BACKUP -backupTarget:M: -include:C: -allCritical -systemState -vssFull
.
I was trying to be nice so as not to rile up the mods here!
But I'd agree with you! Spend more time fixing and patching and updating and troubleshooting that software than you do on the servers they're backingup!
Always wanted to check out Backup Assist a lot more back in the day. But I'm so focused on full image backups now with ease of importing into a hypervisor..I'm lovin' StorageCraft.
I'm loving the features of StorageCraft, but the price tag is ouch. Probably is way more worth it though. .
I find it a little less than BackupExec equivalent products.
It's a cool history re: StorageCraft.
The guys that started the company, there are 4 of them, years ago they started a company called PowerQuest. Those of you guys that are old timers in IT like me...may remember that name brand from back in the DOS and Win3 days.."PQDI.EXE".
Symantec bought up PowerQuest (and destroyed it..just like they do with many other things). However...those 4 guys cooked up StorageCraft and ...the rest is history. Rather newer "brand name"..hasn't been around very long, but the people and technology have.
I LOVED PQ! I knew symantec bought them up and thats why I used it. I never knew they were the ones to make that. I'm seeing storagecraft for servers at around $900 and I'm seeing newest backup exec for servers at around $758.
I was going by Symantecs website..their MSRP
http://buy.symantec.com/estore/cate...ct/productCode/BEC-WSBE-EXP-LEM_2012_12MO_PC/
I had starting at $1,172.00 and on up from there depending on agents.
What have you been getting it at? Mind sharing a vendor?.
I will PM you my contact...she's the eastern coast rep.
It's a cool history re: StorageCraft.
The guys that started the company, there are 4 of them, years ago they started a company called PowerQuest. Those of you guys that are old timers in IT like me...may remember that name brand from back in the DOS and Win3 days.."PQDI.EXE".
Symantec bought up PowerQuest (and destroyed it..just like they do with many other things). However...those 4 guys cooked up StorageCraft and ...the rest is history. Rather newer "brand name"..hasn't been around very long, but the people and technology have.
I always heard it called fuckup exec. (sorry...)
I use Backup Assist which is a shell that runs on top of the native Windows Backup system.
I'm loving the features of StorageCraft, but the price tag is ouch. Probably is way more worth it though. You are 100% correct about backup exec. I simply never do the updates to them because I've come to realize that the updates break more than they fix, so unless you actually see an issue with how the backups are being done, then dont update be.
I'm trying out backup assist atm and it's setup is kind of confusing. Makes it look like I can backup exchange but not the file system, or backup the file system and not exchange.
Wondering how many of you guys actually use and trust the new windows server backup on 2008+ servers.