Goodbye windows 8 ?

bertie40

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
426
Location
Leeds, UK
http://thetim.es/1ePts1C

From "The Times" (UK)

"
Microsoft plans to cut its losses on Windows 8, the latest version of the software that runs the majority of the world’s computers, jettisoning the brand in an attempt to appease millions of disgruntled users.
Industry sources believe that the world’s biggest software company will announce a new operating system, codenamed “Threshold”, at an event in April.
"

Wow.
 
Good riddance to Windows 8. I'm even using Windows 8.1. 8.1 is not so bad but still they could have done things better. If they are going to do a dual interface, they need to give you the choice of which you like and let you switch between them.
 
http://thetim.es/1ePts1C

From "The Times" (UK)

"
Microsoft plans to cut its losses on Windows 8, the latest version of the software that runs the majority of the world’s computers, jettisoning the brand in an attempt to appease millions of disgruntled users.
Industry sources believe that the world’s biggest software company will announce a new operating system, codenamed “Threshold”, at an event in April.
"

Wow.

Can't read it. Not unless you subscribe. :(
 
"Metro" should have been some kind of "enhancement pack". Win8 should have been a much improved Win 7 and if you wanted this whole convoluted Metro garbage you could just install it and it would "upgrade" your GUI.
 
In case you can't read the story .....

"Microsoft plans to cut its losses on Windows 8, the latest version of the software that runs the majority of the world’s computers, jettisoning the brand in an attempt to appease millions of disgruntled users.
Industry sources believe that the world’s biggest software company will announce a new operating system, codenamed “Threshold”, at an event in April.
It is understood that ultimately Microsoft will call the system Windows 9 — a move, nonetheless, away from the Windows 8 brand that executives believe has become irreparably damaged by poor sales and scathing customer reviews.
The company will also make a number of changes to the system’s design and functionality. It will go on sale in 2015, far earlier than many anticipated.
It is only 15 months since Microsoft launched Windows 8, described as a bold reinvention of the bestselling software. Instead of inviting users to click on icons and boxes, it features big, colourful on-screen tiles that are meant to be touched. It was intended to transform Microsoft into a player on mobile phones and tablets.
Yet the company’s changes have alienated many who had become familiar with the original software. Last year Microsoft offered a free upgrade, called Windows 8.1, in an attempt to respond to the criticism. This included bringing back the “Start” button, which had formed part of every version of the software since 1995. Analysts said that Windows 8 was also struggling because it offered considerably fewer apps than rivals such as Android, Google’s software for mobiles, and Apple devices.
Paul Thurrott, an independent analyst and respected blogger on Microsoft, reported yesterday that the company was planning to unveil a series of changes during its “Build” conference in April. “To distance itself from the Windows 8 debacle, Microsoft is currently planning to drop the . . . name and brand this next release as Windows 9,” he said. “That could change, but that’s the current thinking.”
Other significant changes will be the “Metro” design of the software, although details remain unclear.
According to NetMarketShare, the internet statistics site, the overall share of Windows 8 is 10 per cent, well behind rivals such as Android. Sales of Windows 7, its predecessor, however, continue to rise.
“When we talk to the manufacturers, they say corporate clients are still buying more Windows 7 PCs,” Richard Holway, chairman of the industry researcher TechMarketView, said. “Windows 8 is not getting a look-in from the corporate users and the consumers I’ve spoken to all say they are appalled by it. I don’t think Microsoft completely understood what people wanted to do with it.”
Company sources insisted that they were encouraged by the range of new devices being released this year that run Windows 8 and pointed to the 100 million-plus licences of the software that were sold within its first six months of release.
Nevertheless, executives are understood to be increasingly concerned about the lack of uptake for Windows 8 on mobile devices. They believe a failure to break into this market could be disastrous, as consumers shift from traditional PCs.
Some suggested that the confusion over who will take over from Steve Ballmer, Microsoft’s chief executive, is damaging attempts to reboot the software. Last week Alan Mulally, the Ford chief executive, ruled himself for the role and other candidates are thought to include Stephen Elop, Nokia’s former chief executive, Satya Nadella, the head of Microsoft’s enterprise group, and Tony Bates, who leads business development. No decision is expected before next month, but may take longer.

"
 
"I don’t think Microsoft completely understood what people wanted to do with it."


There it is right there. Microsoft completely forgot how/why people used Windows to begin with.
 
Glad to see this really. Hopefully 9 is similar to 7 but with the improvements and nice booting speed of 8. Hopefully this can mean some added revenue to upgrade outta 8 for people that don't like it...but also on those cheapies that had no win7 drivers.
 
I wonder if Ubuntu and gnome are paying attention to "The writing on the wall" with M$ ?

The unity and gnome3 desktops are just as bad IMHO.

What M$ and others have failed to understand is that its the free economy that determines where an operating system should go. Not some developers that think our opinion is not important.

Glad to hear it.

coffee :)
 
I don't think I can take that article seriously. Windows 8 is an operating system built for Tablets and Touch Screen Computers. The Metro Start Screen is the future of Windows.
 
I don't think I can take that article seriously. Windows 8 is an operating system built for Tablets and Touch Screen Computers. The Metro Start Screen is the future of Windows.

Not if the user base doesn't purchase it and avoids it. I have a few clients that have it and ALL of them hate it. I either have rolled them back to Windows 7 or installed some kind of start menu replacement.
 
Metro works fine on Windows Phone (don't laugh, I got mine for free. And the one after it too.)

On a non-touchscreen PC it's a clumsy PITA. All my customers with 8 use StartIsBack and the only one that complained was one that had to reset her laptop to factory and wanted to "get the Start button back".

10%. That's gotta hurt. Couldn't happen to a nicer lot...
 
Is it too soon to say I told you so? Microsoft had a great product and windows 7. They completely screwed it up with windows 8 providing a solution to a nonexisting problem. They need to take a page out of the Apple handbook and have a mobile operating system as well as a desktop operating system. These two operating systems can crossover in certain places. But, what Microsoft has to learn is that a mobile operating system does not work well on a desktop PC, and a desktop operating system does not work well on a touch screen PC. With windows nine Microsoft needs to get back to basics. It needs to start with Windows 7 and improve the things that need to be improved. Stability, security,ect. Leave the UI alone there is nothing wrong with it. If you want to throw in a few new themes and wallpapers great. We can call it Windows 7 SP2!
 
I say just take Windows 8, keep essentially what is there, with the speed improvements and what not(don't force me into cloud computing and microsoft accounts though), and offer 2 UI's as they are doing. But do it differently.

Make it a choice. Have a pop up when I first set my computer up to where it asks how I prefer to use it, as a classic interface or as a touch oriented Modern interface. If I select touch, give me the metro screen with UI improvements to work better naturally. If I select classic interface, give me a desktop environment that looks acts and works like Windows 7 with the speed improvements of Windows 8. Also give me a way of running the metro apps on my desktop if I want.

Make it so that the two interfaces are not interfering. If I select classic, don't make me ever have to see Metro. Also make a way to switch between those interfaces so that if I want to try the other one, I can toggle a switch on and off.
 
I am using 8.1 on my own office system, which is a basic Pentium based Haswell system and 4GB RAM. It is very very fast and works extremely well. I actually think Windows 8.1 minus Metro would be a very good product.

It is a lot faster than Windows 7 it is just the user interface even on 8.1 needs work, Metro needs ditching completely.
 
Make it a choice. Have a pop up when I first set my computer up to where it asks how I prefer to use it, as a classic interface or as a touch oriented Modern interface. If I select touch, give me the metro screen with UI improvements to work better naturally. If I select classic interface, give me a desktop environment that looks acts and works like Windows 7 with the speed improvements of Windows 8. Also give me a way of running the metro apps on my desktop if I want.

You sense the blatantly obvious as do I and others. What were the movers and shakers at MS thinking? What a kludge 8 turned out to be.
 
Back
Top