Excel Sorting, "My data has headers" checkbox

HCHTech

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
4,237
Location
Pittsburgh, PA - USA
This is something that has been bugging me for a while and I finally forced myself to try and find the answer.

When you sort a range in Excel, it tries to help you by guessing whether or not you have headers in the first row. If it thinks you do, then it pre-checks the "My data has headers" checkbox on the sorting dialog. If it thinks you DON'T, then it leaves this checkbox blank. So far, so good - except it seems that this guessing process is often wrong - resulting in you having to either uncheck the box or check the box when it guesses wrong.

In two business-critical spreadsheets that I am in every single day and sort multiple ways to answer different questions, it was getting this guess wrong 100% of the time. I have a blank row between the titles and the data, and I never include that row in the sorting range, yet it insisted on pre-checking that box. Every time.

I turns out that ANY content in any of those cells, or ANY special characteristics applied to those cells (centering, shading, etc.) causes Excel to think they are titles and therefore pre-check that damned box. Since both of the spreadsheets where I have this problem are old and have been saved daily for years and years, some attribute or another must have gotten stuck on for one or more of these blank-looking cells. Ultimately, I deleted that row altogether, inserted a new row, then checked the attributes on every cell to make sure there were not invisible borders, or white shading, etc. - things that would look blank but not BE blank.

What do you know, it has guessed correctly that there are no headers in my sort range every time for a week now. I cannot tell you how these little thorn-in-the-side issues get to me over time. Well, it appears that dragon is now slain, so there is one less thing bothering me every day now. :cool:

I hope this helps someone!
 
@HCHTech

I would also encourage you to use Excel tables when this is possible. It not only "looks better" but this problem does not occur (or at least not with the same frequency).

In-worksheet tables, real tables, in Excel is grossly underused. Just what you get from a visual perspective with table options for shading, etc., makes the effort to "table-ize" data that is, in actuality, a table makes it worth it, in my opinion.
 
I would also encourage you to use Excel tables when this is possible. It not only "looks better" but this problem does not occur (or at least not with the same frequency).

I'm definitely a victim of the old-dog-new-tricks syndrome - haha. If I were having any other problems, I might look into it, but I would need a bigger reason that this to devote bandwidth to re-working either of these.
 
I stopped using that entirely. I hit the format as table button, then once it's a table I sort.

It's vastly more consistent, and the table structure can be referenced for lookups.

The "old" sheet issue can be fixed by clearing all formatting and recreating it, it may also require the convert to range feature to remove any tables there.
 
I Second Tables. Ctrl + t will bring it up...

Not only that, you can tell it if your table has headers or not.

1749216710814.png

Really want some new tricks??? Bring up Power Query and add your tables to the data model.
 
Power Query + tables = Excel doing things no spreadsheet has any right to be doing!

And I don't say that in a bad way, I'm just saying the thing can do Data Manipulation on a scale comparable to the most advanced AI systems. You can fully prototype some serious carnage in Excel!

M365 Copilot + Excel + tables = human doesn't need to remember the magic, just ask for it, get a working example and mutate from there.

Cold dead hands... that's where people will find my Copilot enriched Excel, and what it would take to get me to stop using it!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top