Ccomp5950
Member
- Reaction score
- 13
- Location
- Marshall, Texas
Let me break it down
All you sarcasm means nothing. You can't disprove anything I said and this is simply a cop out, nothing more nothing less.
Ever wonder why I disregard your opinions?
Let's go back a bit in time shall we? Or as you said, break it down.
You go on about how you (as a linux dabbler (end user)) had trouble installing a driver. You use this anecdote to make the claim that since you had trouble installing a driver...
When set up properly it works fine but we are far from the day the typical end user can set up a Linux box with no problems.
I agree and also bring in my own anecdote about a standard retail windows 7 disk did not have OEM support in that the drivers used by the box were not packaged in the disk I was using. Upon booting the computer I find it is missing Network drivers. My point is: What would an end user do in this situation? Wouldn't it be a problem? So I guess windows is far from the day the typical end user can setup a Windows box with no problems.
The point is quite plain and simple, setting up an OS with no support the only one that does well is Mac OS (since the hardware is built for the OS of course).
Then you counter my comment about end users with a comment about how YOU (not an end user, with regards to windows) would fix the problem.
Um...download them on a working system , put them on a flash drive and install them to the new systems? Thats what I might do.
Wait, we're not talking about you or me, we're talking about end users. When I point out we're talking about end users instead of admitting "well maybe he has a point" you ignore it. Which only further shows your bias.
I'm not Richard Stalman, what I am is a man who doesn't care for your style of debate (ignore, move goal posts, rebut strawmen). If you can't look back at the conversation and see one simple point, it's not me who is the zealot here.
I've made multiple attempts now to bring you back to the original point. You have shown multiple times that you are completely ignorant of the point and the surrounding facts, thus you are being disregarded. Call it a cop out, call it what you wish. I don't negotiate with terrorists and I don't debate irrational men.
As for your comment about being an arrogant prick, I tried being nice, when you don't respond with that but ignore the claims or shift the ground rules to something you prefer, I'm not going to be nice about it. I'm going to point out your flaw in thinking and I'm going to put it on display so you either take a look at it and go "oops, my bad" or you just show your ass some more like you've been doing.
Last edited: