[TIP] Yet another reason to like Win11

Metanis

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
992
Location
Medford, WI, USA
A feature driven by the Clowdstrike fiasco. New Win11 Quick Machine Recovery will use Windows update or corporate recovery systems to get a machine out of boot loops. Surprisingly it's enabled by default on Win11 Home edition, however Pro and higher require manual config and/or GPO.

I've turned it on for my fleet.

 
The problem is more often than not Windows won't boot because there's a hardware failure (usually the SSD). Even if this "fixes" the boot issue, all it will do is mask the problem until the drive fails completely, losing all your data. I'm talking home users here of course. Microsoft assuming every home user has OneDrive is extremely irresponsible. These boot loops are the only reason a client comes in for repair. If this "Quick Recovery" feature temporarily fixes the issue, they're not going to bring it in until the drive is completely dead and they've lost all their data. Microsoft doesn't give a crap about their users, however. They haven't since Windows 8 came out in 2012. All they care about is creating the illusion that Windows is "reliable." I don't blame them for wanting to portray that image, but if they spent half as much time actually making Windows reliable and creating software that people WANT to use (like they used to) as they did trying to cram garbage software that no one wants down user's throats, they wouldn't be losing so many customers to MacOS and Linux.
 
I really don't understand how anyone who's here in this space can even attempt to make the claim that Windows has not become more stable, and easy to use, by leaps and bounds over its lifetime. You couldn't pay me to go back to Windows 8 or earlier for love nor money. I don't miss Windows 10 one bit, because Windows 11 has improved upon it (and, yes, I know that Windows 11 is essentially a marketing choice, and a direct extension of Windows 10, but the general point is valid).

You can detest Windows, and I'm not trying to convince anyone that they shouldn't, but there's no objective measure by which Windows has not continuously improved over the many years it's been in existence. When I think about what I used to have to do in my desk jobs, and in my job as a technician, with the care and feeding of Windows 7, and particularly before Windows 7, I can't imagine how I tolerated it. But, as in all things at any given point in time and evolution, it's all about what you're accustomed to.

Every single computer user should use what they find suits them best. For me, and for a number of different reasons, I can't see that changing away from Windows. At least not so long as I remain in this business as an active technician. If I didn't have the knowledge of how Windows works, in its current guises, at my fingertips I would not be able to do probably 98% of the work I'm called on to do. It would be career suicide.
 
Stable yes easy to use is a bit debatable but they have become undeniably forceful in their methods of bringing new "features" to the user base. These features are shoved on users regardless of the practicality and real world needs which earns much of the ire directed toward MS and disapproval of these new "features"/functions. MS has also shown reason to not be trusted so the skepticism of the reality of these new features/functions is also something MS has earned.
 
Stable yes easy to use is a bit debatable but they have become undeniably forceful in their methods of bringing new "features" to the user base. These features are shoved on users regardless of the practicality and real world needs which earns much of the ire directed toward MS and disapproval of these new "features"/functions. MS has also shown reason to not be trusted so the skepticism of the reality of these new features/functions is also something MS has earned.
You’re absolutely right about Microsoft’s increasingly forceful approach. The problem is these “features” aren’t truly optional. They arrive whether you want them or not, and they can’t simply be uninstalled. They sit there, collecting telemetry and serving Microsoft’s agenda rather than the user’s. Where is the “No, I don’t want this” button? Where is the uninstall option once these features are pushed?

By contrast, with Linux, anything installed during the initial setup can be removed, changed, or disabled with minimal effort. Nothing gets added, altered, or removed without my explicit permission. I'm not forced or coerced into creating a "Microsoft account" to make tracking easier for them.
That level of control is something Microsoft stopped respecting long ago.
If I didn't have the knowledge of how Windows works, in its current guises, at my fingertips I would not be able to do probably 98% of the work I'm called on to do. It would be career suicide.
I find your comment puzzling. Stepping away from Windows doesn’t automatically make someone uninformed or incapable of supporting it. Knowledge doesn’t vanish the moment you stop using a product daily.

I’m retired now, but I still support clients who insist on sticking with Microsoft, and I do so without running Windows on my own systems. Staying up to date doesn’t require total immersion - there are countless ways to keep sharp, from documentation to professional forums like Technibble.

Suggesting that not running Windows is “career suicide” implies dependency rather than skill. A strong IT professional should be adaptable, capable of learning and troubleshooting without needing to live inside a single ecosystem.
 
I find your comment puzzling. Stepping away from Windows doesn’t automatically make someone uninformed or incapable of supporting it.
I see enough Windows 10 / 11 & Mac / iPhone / Android each day to be fully capable of supporting them...
And I don't use any of those :)
 
Back
Top