I agree that Windows is in it's last few years, decade at most, of dominance (and it should be as it is a horrible OS).
The way I see it if Android programmers can keep the OS trim and un-bloated then I think they will have a hands down winner and will gain market share and compatibility with standard PC hardware (Intel / AMD CPU's, and GPU's).
I think everyone should take a look at their current PC's and compare them to the original Pentium's or even 486's. I do not think my Intel Quad core 3.2 Ghz with 8GB ram, 1Gb video, 6TB hd is any faster than a new install of Win 95/98 when opening Word or Excel of the similar year.
As the hardware got faster, Microsoft just threw in more crap that inevitably corrupted and slowed down my machine. I don't think my quad core is a time saver in doing word processing, spread sheets or even basic low quality web surfing. What has all this speed gotten us if the OS is a morbidly obese retarded schizophrenic?
I look at the business world and think they have been swindled for the last 25 years by the PC/software industries. For the amount of $$ they spend all they get is more eye candy instead of more functionality and less processing times. The PC is supposed to be a time saver and a faster PC is supposed to run faster, but not if it is a Windows machine!
Does anyone else agree that the increase in processor & hard drive speed is no where near proportionate to the speed increase/time decrease of the same task performed by the computer?