I'm a bit of a 9/11 skeptic. Simple physics tells you that we don't have the full picture. 110 story steel frame buildings with only 10% damage from a kerosene fire can't possibly fall down through the path of most resistance and pulverize themselves at just slightly less then free fall speed. Yet that is what happened.
Ok, I dont want to get into this deeply but I will go this far.
Its not "kerosene", you shouldnt play down the intensity of burning modern jet fuel.
It's not 10% damage causing 100% failure, its critical to understand the design of the building.
It was not a STEEL
FRAME BUILDING, not a frame everyone is used to.
The towers were designed with a new exoskeleton support system, not a standard box type.
The towers were designed to survive an impact from a 707 (conspiracy theory people say 747, that is wrong, the 747 didnt exist when the towers were designed.). What hit was Boeing 767's. Now conspiracy people say the 707 and the 767 arent much different, just faster, more passengers. It is different. If you know anything about ballisitics, compare a .22 pellet gun with a .22 rifle. Just the "ballistic" differences of the 707 and 767 are enough.
The heat from the fire did NOT melt the steel, it softened the support braces. The softening caused the metal to warp and the critical support areas collapsed on one floor causing the weight of that floor to be placed onto the next floor below it. It was not a gentle placement of the weight either, it was a drop of the floor onto the next. The lower floor is not designed to take
not only twice the weight of the above floor but ALL the floors above it as the upper floors now collapsed inward due to the exoskeleton design.
Once the first collapse occured the building could not possibly survive, all the floors above began to collapse onto the next floor and the weight plus impact of the collapse caused each floor to collapse. The collapse was near vertical due to the design of the building and how previous floors were collapsing causing the exoskeletion to flop inwards from the top down.
I worked in WTC1 for a few years. You could not put bombs or thermite or anything in the walls, the walls were so thin and there was so little in between the windows. Nobody could have designed something in 1966 to be set off in 2001 without hundreds if not thousands of people knowing. To this day only a handful of nut jobs claim to "know something" about bombs.
That's all I am going to say, I know that there are all kinds of weird theories and each has been proven to be wrong but people don't want to let it go.
I guess people need to find something to do with their free time and I guess this is one of those things.