Appletax
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 396
- Location
- Northern Michigan
I ran a Windows Server 2008 R2 VM from my USB 2.0 external HDD and it ran pretty good. I had to make a new one for my new external USB 3.0 HDD because one of the files wouldn't copy over. I gave it access to 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM. It uses a lot of the CPU cycles and runs slow. I'm not sure what the issue is here.
I'd like to know how important the Intel VT-d feature is for running VMs. I would switch over to the 4771 CPU if it meant my VMs would be a lot faster. I'm not doing anything fancy with my VMs, just using them for learning how to use different OSs.
I installed the Enterprise edition and started it out with 4 cores because I didn't know it could do 8 logical cores. Maybe I should install a new VM w/ standard edition and give it 8 cores out the bat. I could also try running it from a RAMDISK once I get my 32 GB of RAM to see if the HDD is a bottleneck.
Edit: my problem was that I had the VM set to use all 8 logical cores. Scaled this back to 4 and everything runs fast!
I'd like to know how important the Intel VT-d feature is for running VMs. I would switch over to the 4771 CPU if it meant my VMs would be a lot faster. I'm not doing anything fancy with my VMs, just using them for learning how to use different OSs.
I installed the Enterprise edition and started it out with 4 cores because I didn't know it could do 8 logical cores. Maybe I should install a new VM w/ standard edition and give it 8 cores out the bat. I could also try running it from a RAMDISK once I get my 32 GB of RAM to see if the HDD is a bottleneck.
Edit: my problem was that I had the VM set to use all 8 logical cores. Scaled this back to 4 and everything runs fast!
Last edited: