ComputerDave
Active Member
- Reaction score
- 36
- Location
- Owensboro, Kentucky
Intel has its own tool. OCCT is all over the place and has proven to be unreliable. What are you guys using to test AMD CPUs?
We have a gaming rig that I highly suspect has a faulty AMD CPU. I would just like to have a smoking gun instead of guessing.Sorry I don’t have any advice, but I have a question: why are you testing CPUs? I don’t do much hardware troubleshooting these days so maybe that’s why I don’t do it. Are you building machines? Or is the test part of broader troubleshooting?
Thank you for that. I will check out the Prime95 and see what happens.Put it in the oven at 200 Degrees Celsius for 5 minutes.
Have you tried Prime95, works for me on Intel & AMD.
Here is a guide I found may be helpfull, not on Prime95 though in general.
Yes, this is a very valid point. That probably would be best. The only drawback is I might get stuck with some CPU's that, by the time the opportunity arrives for me to move those, I might have to take a loss.I've gotten to a point where I keep a few spare CPU's in the shop (or I'll order one of whichever generation/Brand needed). If I think a CPU is the problem - I plop a new one in, assuming I've exhausted everything else.
Have you received the results you felt were accurate using the Intel tool, even with AMD?The Intel tool works on anything.
A CPU is a CPU... it either runs the operations and returns the expected result or it doesn't.Have you received the results you felt were accurate using the Intel tool, even with AMD?
CPU failure is a LOT more common than it used to be, unfortunately. They've gotten so complex and the memory controller is even inside modern CPUs. Diagnosing CPU failure is also a lot harder nowadays unless it's REALLY bad (like, won't boot Windows bad but isn't degraded so badly that you can still boot into diagnostic software like Eurosoft's PC-Check). I've seen even really bad CPUs pass all the standard tests. The only way to really diagnose a failing CPU nowadays is to replace it. It's also not uncommon for memory tests to fail and have it be the CPU itself, not the RAM that's the culprit.CPUs rarely fail
Eurosoft's PC-Check or Ultra-X. I can't personally recommend Ultra-X because I've never used it but I've talked to other techs who have and they say it's good at catching a lot of stuff.OCCT is all over the place and has proven to be unreliable.
CPU failure is a LOT more common than it used to be, unfortunately. They've gotten so complex and the memory controller is even inside modern CPUs. Diagnosing CPU failure is also a lot harder nowadays unless it's REALLY bad (like, won't boot Windows bad but isn't degraded so badly that you can still boot into diagnostic software like Eurosoft's PC-Check). I've seen even really bad CPUs pass all the standard tests. The only way to really diagnose a failing CPU nowadays is to replace it. It's also not uncommon for memory tests to fail and have it be the CPU itself, not the RAM that's the culprit.
Eurosoft's PC-Check or Ultra-X. I can't personally recommend Ultra-X because I've never used it but I've talked to other techs who have and they say it's good at catching a lot of stuff.
Yep, I get plenty of thoseThey all want a rolls royce for the cost of a junk yard clunker