Logo critique

To be honest I'm not keen on any of the top rated ones.

I certainly don't like the current #1 - I think that web 2.0 style gloss, metal and 3D effects have long since had their day and are already very dated. Design has moved on and it's gone much more minimalist and simple.

To that end I'd say #4 is a lot more modern but still overly complicated. It has too many features for me: the circuit effect, the aerial I, the circular sweep etc. I'd lose 1 or more of those, probably the circuit effect as it's not that recognisable by the average person anyway. Also the "techno" writing of services is a bit naff IMO - a bit smoothed off and techy is OK but the R looks dated.

Or the others ones that are least rated look better to me - like #43 and so on.
 
#59 Stands out best IMHO. I have to think that the double-logo shown is an example of two separate applications of the logo. All the others seem to blend too much printed circuit board and swooshy graphics into the "P" in Park.
 
I like #105, it would look good with any number of colors, or even monotone, and at any size. #50 is very professional, but looks a bit too AT&T ... #137 reminds me of NES, and I like it.
 
Back
Top