Blues
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 562
- Location
- Tennessee, US
Yes I agree in an instance where Windows doesn't detect another AV or doesn't disable Defender in the presence of another AV Defender should be forcibly shutdown but make note of it and let client know so if they were to ever remove or replace the AV solution that this potential vulnerability exists.So Defender does not detect Emsisoft...and stays running? Normally, by default, Windows will disable Defender once Windows detects a 3rd party AV.
https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us...rd-party/37c133c8-c779-4336-b48a-4390dbcc5ba1
Having 2x antivirus programs running real time at the same time is not best practice..they can step on each others toes and interfere with each other, even rendering each other rather useless. If not cause huge performance loss and other possible conflicts.
@Computer Bloke & @sapphirescales I wouldn't try to prove that infection missed by solution A is caught by solution B but that in the overall AV world solution A or B out preforms the other in performance, system impact, invasive behavior(negative impact on user experience which is less), and security results. Going off one specific example just says well if this specific thing hits you again your safe Id rather know which is safer over all than which protects me from one specific attack. If you have your own research great but myself I tend to use the research already out there and done by others.