MobileTechie
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 32
- Location
- UK
I'm English and live my life thinking "i'm in it for our species", with that in mind i consider what Sony did to be a very bad thing.
Sony spent $$lots$$ on this movie which directly targets the leader of a country, if this was a school yard, Sony are the bullies here!
I haven't heard about bombing theatres, i'd hope (and i sincerely mean hope) is purely propaganda talk by the bullies allies due to the stance taken (hacking) by the smaller kid.
This film should never have been made with the characters chosen, Sony should have made up a fictional country, with a fictional leader, but they didn't. Imagine if NK had the same budget and "prestige" and made a film about assassinating Obama, would that be OK? and would it taken as lightly as expected?
by stating any reason this film should be released for free is only fueling the fire and is exactly how the bully wants you to react. I'd imagine if you were north-korean you'd think very differently.
My "review" is Sony should apologise and admit they did wrong by this, because the nitty-gritty is, they were wrong to allow this film to be made without the explicit permission of the people it portrays. they knew exactly what they were doing and it has backed fired with the smaller kid retaliations hurting them.
I find this a crazy argument. We live in a democracy and people and private companies can make comedy files about brutal dictators if they want. If there is a more legitimate target for satire than him, I don't know who it is. Hell, we have enough films and sketches taking the pi** out of presidents, prime ministers, religious leaders, pop stars etc etc. Are they to get "explicit permission" from all of these people? That's just censorship under a different name.
Any world leader who wasn't a paranoid nut-job and any country with any self respect would laugh it off. If someone wants to make a comedy about killing David Cameron they have my full blessing, as long as they don't actually kill him. And I guarantee that the USA would not be making threats and accusations of war etc if the boot was on the other foot.
You really want the satirists to apologise to a guy who brutally suppresses millions of people, and tortures and murders anyone who he feels is a threat to his continued rule just because he's the leader of a country?
Last edited: