Hello,
OK so I had this customer come in with this 5 year old computer that had viruses on it. He didn't want a nuke and pave because he has software on the pc that he cannot replace.
We checked the pc in and performed our routine virus removal (manual & Scans) tested PC and things looked solid. Installed Kaspersky A/V and updated - no issues.
Customer picked up the PC and went home and did a full scan w/ the Kaspersky we installed. It found 2 infections in some of his legacy software directories. He called us back and he wanted to bring back in the PC for rework. N/P re-checked in PC and removed the 2 infections that were found with Kaspersky. This time he wanted his C:\ cloned to a 1.5TB drive to be installed, and remove the original hard drive for storage in his safety deposit box. N/P Done.
Customer picked up the PC yesterday (tested at front counter to his satisfaction). Now he calls this morning saying that his Adobe Photoshop states "Scratch Disks are Full".
I'm not exactly sure why he is getting this error now because all we did was remove infections, clone after clean, done. Customer said the classic line "It worked before". Adobe tech note states: Photoshop uses a scratch disk (temporary disk space used for storing data and performing computations) when there is insufficient RAM for image editing. When there is insufficient RAM and scratch disk space to perform image editing operations, Photoshop returns the error "Scratch disk is full.".
I am strongly leaning towards not messing with virus removal at all.
Not because i don't know how to remove them, or that i am not confident in my skills, but because the liability that is held over the shops head once that computer has been picked up. IMO you can be the master of virus removals and getting them off the machine, but that doesn't account for the damage the viruses may have done to the OS and the 3rd party apps. How many times have we all heard that classic line "it worked before". There is noway we can test every piece of software that is on the PC before check-out. Now the pc/issue is been looked at for the 3rd time on our dime.
I will be the first to admit we may have either missed the 2 infections on his PC or he got re-infected once he got home (i don't see how with Kaspersky being installed). This is very very rare for us, however we have all missed an infection in our time in this profession.
Even if we hadn't missed any and this Adobe issue occurred I guarantee you we would be held accountable, because "it worked before".
My point being (and it happens weekly) customer comes in has virus removed, calls back few days or a week later stating one of his apps or World of Warcraft add-on isn't working right and it has to be from the "virus".
Lets face it, we know our clients are scared of computers as it is, and when you are the last person that touched it, it automatically becomes your responsibility to fix.
It is the customers responsibility to ensure they have the proper licensed software and media (not ours) to install in-case of disaster. In our past 6 months in our retail shop and the past 2 years out of our home, it has become more apparent that it is more cost effective to Backup/Nuke/Pave/Import/Configure Image Backups not only for the customer but for the business. I have found that customers who get their PC back after having the viruses removed are still nervous about still being infected because the system has been compromised. Customers who have Nuke/Pave are still nervous but its because the majority of people hate change.
But then I think how much business will we lose?
But then I think how much money will we actually make if the customers are paranoid.
Virus removals can't really be warrantied? or can they?
Very frustrating situation this age old question of remove or Nuke.
OK so I had this customer come in with this 5 year old computer that had viruses on it. He didn't want a nuke and pave because he has software on the pc that he cannot replace.
We checked the pc in and performed our routine virus removal (manual & Scans) tested PC and things looked solid. Installed Kaspersky A/V and updated - no issues.
Customer picked up the PC and went home and did a full scan w/ the Kaspersky we installed. It found 2 infections in some of his legacy software directories. He called us back and he wanted to bring back in the PC for rework. N/P re-checked in PC and removed the 2 infections that were found with Kaspersky. This time he wanted his C:\ cloned to a 1.5TB drive to be installed, and remove the original hard drive for storage in his safety deposit box. N/P Done.
Customer picked up the PC yesterday (tested at front counter to his satisfaction). Now he calls this morning saying that his Adobe Photoshop states "Scratch Disks are Full".
I'm not exactly sure why he is getting this error now because all we did was remove infections, clone after clean, done. Customer said the classic line "It worked before". Adobe tech note states: Photoshop uses a scratch disk (temporary disk space used for storing data and performing computations) when there is insufficient RAM for image editing. When there is insufficient RAM and scratch disk space to perform image editing operations, Photoshop returns the error "Scratch disk is full.".
I am strongly leaning towards not messing with virus removal at all.
Not because i don't know how to remove them, or that i am not confident in my skills, but because the liability that is held over the shops head once that computer has been picked up. IMO you can be the master of virus removals and getting them off the machine, but that doesn't account for the damage the viruses may have done to the OS and the 3rd party apps. How many times have we all heard that classic line "it worked before". There is noway we can test every piece of software that is on the PC before check-out. Now the pc/issue is been looked at for the 3rd time on our dime.
I will be the first to admit we may have either missed the 2 infections on his PC or he got re-infected once he got home (i don't see how with Kaspersky being installed). This is very very rare for us, however we have all missed an infection in our time in this profession.
Even if we hadn't missed any and this Adobe issue occurred I guarantee you we would be held accountable, because "it worked before".
My point being (and it happens weekly) customer comes in has virus removed, calls back few days or a week later stating one of his apps or World of Warcraft add-on isn't working right and it has to be from the "virus".
Lets face it, we know our clients are scared of computers as it is, and when you are the last person that touched it, it automatically becomes your responsibility to fix.
It is the customers responsibility to ensure they have the proper licensed software and media (not ours) to install in-case of disaster. In our past 6 months in our retail shop and the past 2 years out of our home, it has become more apparent that it is more cost effective to Backup/Nuke/Pave/Import/Configure Image Backups not only for the customer but for the business. I have found that customers who get their PC back after having the viruses removed are still nervous about still being infected because the system has been compromised. Customers who have Nuke/Pave are still nervous but its because the majority of people hate change.
But then I think how much business will we lose?
But then I think how much money will we actually make if the customers are paranoid.
Virus removals can't really be warrantied? or can they?
Very frustrating situation this age old question of remove or Nuke.