tankman1989
Active Member
- Reaction score
- 5
I just had a client who had a number of XP workstations and they are planning on upgrading the systems soon. They have the office manager, who is a computer "enthusiast", taking care of the computer systems of the shop. He would like to get new machines and put XP back on them because it is so stable and they are comfortable with it. It just runs shop software so the OS isn't really an issue, but they do use the internet and email, so there is a security issue here. I told him that Win 7 is very stable and that I would recommend that they go that route as XP is at the EOL (end of life) for updates. He didn't really catch onto the real reason for not going back to XP I don't think.
What I tell customers is that after the support stops, the OS does not get updates for security holes or programming issues discovered in the code as it is uncovered. I tell them that this means that this leaves the OS open to exploit vulnerabilities to viruses and malicious software, which usually goes unnoticed. I tell them that even if you have AV software it does not guarantee that you are protected and should really not rely on AV software as a reliable security measure for an unpatched OS.
I really don't know what else I can say to my customers besides this when telling them the reasons for updating their OS at the EOL of the software. Is there anything that I am missing in telling them why they should upgrade? What do you tell your clients when talking about this issue?
If customers need further explanation I will tell them that all Windows OS's are built on the same code. Each release of the OS is just building upon the previous releases so the same base code is running the machines. It's like having a house that is being continually renovated with updates, patches and expansions. There are major changes that happen every major OS release and then there are the minor changes that happen throughout the life of the OS. The thing is that finding a hole in the old software may allow exploitation of the new software so there is incentive for people to keep looking because you never know what it will lead to. Does this sound about correct in analogies?
What I tell customers is that after the support stops, the OS does not get updates for security holes or programming issues discovered in the code as it is uncovered. I tell them that this means that this leaves the OS open to exploit vulnerabilities to viruses and malicious software, which usually goes unnoticed. I tell them that even if you have AV software it does not guarantee that you are protected and should really not rely on AV software as a reliable security measure for an unpatched OS.
I really don't know what else I can say to my customers besides this when telling them the reasons for updating their OS at the EOL of the software. Is there anything that I am missing in telling them why they should upgrade? What do you tell your clients when talking about this issue?
If customers need further explanation I will tell them that all Windows OS's are built on the same code. Each release of the OS is just building upon the previous releases so the same base code is running the machines. It's like having a house that is being continually renovated with updates, patches and expansions. There are major changes that happen every major OS release and then there are the minor changes that happen throughout the life of the OS. The thing is that finding a hole in the old software may allow exploitation of the new software so there is incentive for people to keep looking because you never know what it will lead to. Does this sound about correct in analogies?