Another fine Phishing Scam Letter, Annotated for Education

britechguy

Well-Known Member
Reaction score
4,835
Location
Staunton, VA
I got the letter, below, this morning. When I get what I consider to be quite convincing ones, if you're not paying attention, that is, I tend to take a screen shot and annotate it for client education. I did that here. If anyone finds it might be useful, use it.

How_to_Recognize_an_Email_Phishing_Scam_Letter.jpg
 
The SCAM logo is the correct one. I just pulled out my PP card and double-checked. I'm sure people will fall for the email, however, because they don't bother to double-check.
 
Well, it's not what's on the PayPal website, which is where I got the one I used.

It would not shock me if there's been a slight change or that two exist, for use on different backgrounds.
 
It also makes the scam a bit more sophisticated that it is using an actual variant of the PayPal logo as opposed to a mock-up.

In this case, I'm fine with both being "real" as my main point is to have people pay attention to logos. I've seen more than my share of, "close, but nowhere close enough to get a cigar" variants on logos that the unobservant could be tricked by.
 
It also makes the scam a bit more sophisticated that it is using an actual variant of the PayPal logo as opposed to a mock-up.

In this case, I'm fine with both being "real" as my main point is to have people pay attention to logos. I've seen more than my share of, "close, but nowhere close enough to get a cigar" variants on logos that the unobservant could be tricked by.
I agree with you. I can usually spot a scam right off. If I think something's hinky about an email, I'll read through it, close it, and re-read later to see what I might have thought was suspect about it.
 
The attached PDF being populated by a single image has pretty common for a few years. The scam about recording one “pleasuring” had the entire email as an image for several years. Most anti-malware won’t parse an image for text
 
@Markverhyden

We're saying the same thing, but coming at it from opposite angles.

Scams have used image scanned PDFs for quite a while, and that's their hallmark. Legitmate messages from PayPal and other entities do not, and absolutely do not when what are clearly supposed to be hyperlinks are involved.

I'll tweak the image to say no *legitimate* letter like this would be an image-scanned PDF.

How_to_Recognize_an_Email_Phishing_Scam_Letter.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top