<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prices on Mac and Windows Computers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/</link>
	<description>A Resource for Computer Repair Technicians &#38; to get PC tech support help.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:20:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: gunslinger</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3414</link>
		<dc:creator>gunslinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3414</guid>
		<description>Looks like they are available, just not directly from Dells site.

 But the whole point of all of this was to prove that when you compare the same specs from other OEMs Apple products are not that much more expensive. They are certainly not the 2-3 times more that certain people and certain &quot;tech news&quot; groups have made them out to be.

People tend to compare tend to compare some low quality budget wal-mart PC to the Macbook or the iMac without any regard for specs, computer type ( all in one, tower 13.3&quot; notbook ect.)or quality. Thats wrong and very biased. 

If you or anyone else does not like Macs for whatever reason, great. But people should not make up things to prove why they don&#039;t.

As of this writing Apple does not make a traditional tower PC to compare to other OEMs. 
They make a server grade desktop in the Mac Pro, and all in one, a 13.3&quot; notebook, a highend pro notebook, an ultra lite, and their low end budget mini. So to compare an HP or Dell mid tower PC to any of these is not a fare comparison.

Also, and this is my opinion but its shared by many. There is no comparison between OS X and Vista or XP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like they are available, just not directly from Dells site.</p>
<p> But the whole point of all of this was to prove that when you compare the same specs from other OEMs Apple products are not that much more expensive. They are certainly not the 2-3 times more that certain people and certain &#8220;tech news&#8221; groups have made them out to be.</p>
<p>People tend to compare tend to compare some low quality budget wal-mart PC to the Macbook or the iMac without any regard for specs, computer type ( all in one, tower 13.3&#8243; notbook ect.)or quality. Thats wrong and very biased. </p>
<p>If you or anyone else does not like Macs for whatever reason, great. But people should not make up things to prove why they don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>As of this writing Apple does not make a traditional tower PC to compare to other OEMs.<br />
They make a server grade desktop in the Mac Pro, and all in one, a 13.3&#8243; notebook, a highend pro notebook, an ultra lite, and their low end budget mini. So to compare an HP or Dell mid tower PC to any of these is not a fare comparison.</p>
<p>Also, and this is my opinion but its shared by many. There is no comparison between OS X and Vista or XP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dipper</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3369</link>
		<dc:creator>Dipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3369</guid>
		<description>XP drivers for the Dell laptop are available:
  http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=insp_general&amp;thread.id=253132

So you can dual boot the XPS 1330!!

Plus there are many other laptops with both XP and Vista drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XP drivers for the Dell laptop are available:<br />
  <a href="http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=insp_general&amp;thread.id=253132" rel="nofollow">http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/board/message?board.id=insp_general&amp;thread.id=253132</a></p>
<p>So you can dual boot the XPS 1330!!</p>
<p>Plus there are many other laptops with both XP and Vista drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunslinger</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3366</link>
		<dc:creator>gunslinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3366</guid>
		<description>I guess what I should have said is virus and spyware resistant.


As for being able to dual boot XP with Vista on the XPS 1330 , a quick look at Dells site says they have no XP drivers for the 1330: 

http://tinyurl.com/3y3kty

So your dual booting with XP idea is out of the question. Nope, you are pretty much stuck with Vista.

Also for the record (so you don&#039;t think I&#039;m a Mac fanboy) I have 5 computers in my home, 4 are PCs, one is a Mac. 3 are running XP , one is running Vista and I dual boot my Mac with XP Pro.

Now lets look at the iMac compared to an all in one with the same specs.

Dell XPS one: 20&quot; display, Intel Core 2 Duo  2.33GHz 4M shared L2 Cache,2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz ,320GB SATA drive.

Total:$1,439

iMac: 20&quot; display, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz, 2GB
Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz, 320GB SATA drive.

Total:$1,349.00


Notice how the Macs specs are slightly better than the Dell, and they are the same type of computer both are all in one systems. The Mac is still lower in price even though the RAM is faster and so is the CPU.


You can argue about what you like all day, but you cannot argue with facts. When you compare the same type of system from Dell and Apple, Mac wins. Here are the links to prove it.

http://tinyurl.com/6dnnen

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy

Also its very unprofessional to remove ones post if they prove you wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what I should have said is virus and spyware resistant.</p>
<p>As for being able to dual boot XP with Vista on the XPS 1330 , a quick look at Dells site says they have no XP drivers for the 1330: </p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3y3kty" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3y3kty</a></p>
<p>So your dual booting with XP idea is out of the question. Nope, you are pretty much stuck with Vista.</p>
<p>Also for the record (so you don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m a Mac fanboy) I have 5 computers in my home, 4 are PCs, one is a Mac. 3 are running XP , one is running Vista and I dual boot my Mac with XP Pro.</p>
<p>Now lets look at the iMac compared to an all in one with the same specs.</p>
<p>Dell XPS one: 20&#8243; display, Intel Core 2 Duo  2.33GHz 4M shared L2 Cache,2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz ,320GB SATA drive.</p>
<p>Total:$1,439</p>
<p>iMac: 20&#8243; display, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz, 2GB<br />
Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz, 320GB SATA drive.</p>
<p>Total:$1,349.00</p>
<p>Notice how the Macs specs are slightly better than the Dell, and they are the same type of computer both are all in one systems. The Mac is still lower in price even though the RAM is faster and so is the CPU.</p>
<p>You can argue about what you like all day, but you cannot argue with facts. When you compare the same type of system from Dell and Apple, Mac wins. Here are the links to prove it.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6dnnen" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6dnnen</a></p>
<p><a href="http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy" rel="nofollow">http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy</a></p>
<p>Also its very unprofessional to remove ones post if they prove you wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunslinger</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator>gunslinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3359</guid>
		<description>I guess what I should have said is virus and spyware resistant.


As for being able to dual boot XP with Vista on the XPS 1330 , a quick look at Dells site says they have no XP drivers for the 1330: 

http://tinyurl.com/3y3kty

So your dual booting with XP idea is out of the question. Nope, you are pretty much stuck with Vista.

Also for the record (so you don&#039;t think I&#039;m a Mac fanboy) I have 5 computers in my home, 4 are PCs, one is a Mac. 3 are running XP , one is running Vista and I dual boot my Mac with XP Pro.

Now lets look at the iMac compared to an all in one with the same specs.

Dell XPS one: 20&quot; display, Intel Core 2 Duo  2.33GHz 4M shared L2 Cache,2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz ,320GB SATA drive.

Total:$1,439

iMac: 20&quot; display, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz, 2GB
Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz, 320GB SATA drive.

Total:$1,349.00


Notice how the Macs specs are slightly better than the Dell, and they are the same type of computer both are all in one systems. The Mac is still lower in price even though the RAM is faster and so is the CPU.


You can argue about what you like all day, but you cannot argue with facts. When you compare the same type of system from Dell and Apple, Mac wins. Here are the links to prove it.

http://tinyurl.com/6dnnen

http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what I should have said is virus and spyware resistant.</p>
<p>As for being able to dual boot XP with Vista on the XPS 1330 , a quick look at Dells site says they have no XP drivers for the 1330: </p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3y3kty" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3y3kty</a></p>
<p>So your dual booting with XP idea is out of the question. Nope, you are pretty much stuck with Vista.</p>
<p>Also for the record (so you don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m a Mac fanboy) I have 5 computers in my home, 4 are PCs, one is a Mac. 3 are running XP , one is running Vista and I dual boot my Mac with XP Pro.</p>
<p>Now lets look at the iMac compared to an all in one with the same specs.</p>
<p>Dell XPS one: 20&#8243; display, Intel Core 2 Duo  2.33GHz 4M shared L2 Cache,2GB Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 667MHz ,320GB SATA drive.</p>
<p>Total:$1,439</p>
<p>iMac: 20&#8243; display, Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4GHz, 2GB<br />
Dual Channel DDR2 SDRAM at 800MHz, 320GB SATA drive.</p>
<p>Total:$1,349.00</p>
<p>Notice how the Macs specs are slightly better than the Dell, and they are the same type of computer both are all in one systems. The Mac is still lower in price even though the RAM is faster and so is the CPU.</p>
<p>You can argue about what you like all day, but you cannot argue with facts. When you compare the same type of system from Dell and Apple, Mac wins. Here are the links to prove it.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/6dnnen" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/6dnnen</a></p>
<p><a href="http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy" rel="nofollow">http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Computer Networking</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3355</link>
		<dc:creator>Computer Networking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3355</guid>
		<description>Though I do side with GunSlinger on the issue of Macs (I have a MacBook Pro for my work laptop) I have found 1 issue with his first post. Sorry GunSlinger.

&quot;With the Mac you get nice clean virus and spyware immune OS X&quot;

My buddy Dave got himself a nice set of pop-ups on his MacBook. Since in the last few years Apple has gone from about a 2-3% market share to 8.1 as of October 2007 (http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/17/apples_u_s_mac_market_share_rises_to_8_1_percent_in_q3.html) and certainly larger this year it has become a larger target to malware writers. Sadly.

Oh, and through BootCamp, I dual boot my laptop with OS X 10.5 and Vista Ultimate. I definitely prefer OS X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I do side with GunSlinger on the issue of Macs (I have a MacBook Pro for my work laptop) I have found 1 issue with his first post. Sorry GunSlinger.</p>
<p>&#8220;With the Mac you get nice clean virus and spyware immune OS X&#8221;</p>
<p>My buddy Dave got himself a nice set of pop-ups on his MacBook. Since in the last few years Apple has gone from about a 2-3% market share to 8.1 as of October 2007 (<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/17/apples_u_s_mac_market_share_rises_to_8_1_percent_in_q3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/07/10/17/apples_u_s_mac_market_share_rises_to_8_1_percent_in_q3.html</a>) and certainly larger this year it has become a larger target to malware writers. Sadly.</p>
<p>Oh, and through BootCamp, I dual boot my laptop with OS X 10.5 and Vista Ultimate. I definitely prefer OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dipper</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>Dipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also lets not forget that with the Dell you are again stuck with Vista, where as with the Macbook you can dual boot XP or Vista if you happen to need it for something.&quot;

No you are not &quot;stuck&quot; with Vista, you can dual boot Vista, XP etc!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also lets not forget that with the Dell you are again stuck with Vista, where as with the Macbook you can dual boot XP or Vista if you happen to need it for something.&#8221;</p>
<p>No you are not &#8220;stuck&#8221; with Vista, you can dual boot Vista, XP etc!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunslinger</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3350</link>
		<dc:creator>gunslinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 04:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3350</guid>
		<description>Ok, I figured I&#039;d have to provide &quot;proof&quot;

Dell.com   

XPS m1330: 13.3&quot; screen, 2.4 ghz core 2 duo CPU, 4 gigs of RAM, 250 gig SATA drive.  Total $1,449


Apple.com

MacBook: 13.3&quot; screen, 2.4 ghz core 2 duo CPU,2 gigs of RAM, 250 gig SATA drive. Sub Total $1,399.00   Extra 2 gigs of RAM from newegg.com  $39.99  Total $1,438.99


Notice how the specs are identical? The Mac is $10.01 cheaper.

Funny how when the specs are the same Mac wins. Again the iMac is mentioned and again I ask to be shown an all in one unit with the exact same specs for much less.

Also lets not forget that with the Dell you are again stuck with Vista, where as with the Macbook you can dual boot XP or Vista if you happen to need it for something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I figured I&#8217;d have to provide &#8220;proof&#8221;</p>
<p>Dell.com   </p>
<p>XPS m1330: 13.3&#8243; screen, 2.4 ghz core 2 duo CPU, 4 gigs of RAM, 250 gig SATA drive.  Total $1,449</p>
<p>Apple.com</p>
<p>MacBook: 13.3&#8243; screen, 2.4 ghz core 2 duo CPU,2 gigs of RAM, 250 gig SATA drive. Sub Total $1,399.00   Extra 2 gigs of RAM from newegg.com  $39.99  Total $1,438.99</p>
<p>Notice how the specs are identical? The Mac is $10.01 cheaper.</p>
<p>Funny how when the specs are the same Mac wins. Again the iMac is mentioned and again I ask to be shown an all in one unit with the exact same specs for much less.</p>
<p>Also lets not forget that with the Dell you are again stuck with Vista, where as with the Macbook you can dual boot XP or Vista if you happen to need it for something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: compudoc</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3347</link>
		<dc:creator>compudoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 21:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3347</guid>
		<description>First search i found proves gunslinger wrong, macbook 13&quot;, basic for 1099 with 13&quot; screen, 1 gig ram, 2.1 core 2 and dvd combo.   Dell has the inspiron 1420 with a 14&quot; screen, 2.0 core 2, 3 gig of ram, and a 250 hd with a dvd combo for 849!!  And dont tell me about the quality of this laptop, the company i work for uses 40 of em, and they all hold up well considering our users travel worldwide weekly.  But even the xps at 15.4&quot; screen with 2.0 core2, 2 gig ram, 160 hd and dvd combo is only 999.
I know you&#039;ll use the arguement about included software, but i can get office still and be cheaper.  And this is just dell, i can go to frys.com and get even cheaper and still have a quality computer.
And for an imac, you pay all that money for a &quot;pretty computer&quot;, i can build or buy a computer that&#039;ll run circles around an imac way cheaper.

And for the fanboys out there, i cant wait til they do the poll asking how many apple users also own a pc or boot camp, due to the fact their apple wont do all they want it to, and how they cant use it for work or gaming.  Do that same poll on pc users and see who has a mac....lol, why different results i bet.
And the gaming response....get a console, I have every console, 5 pcs and 3 macs, and gaming on consoles is not the same as gaming on a pc....i.e. warcraft, and other games only on pc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First search i found proves gunslinger wrong, macbook 13&#8243;, basic for 1099 with 13&#8243; screen, 1 gig ram, 2.1 core 2 and dvd combo.   Dell has the inspiron 1420 with a 14&#8243; screen, 2.0 core 2, 3 gig of ram, and a 250 hd with a dvd combo for 849!!  And dont tell me about the quality of this laptop, the company i work for uses 40 of em, and they all hold up well considering our users travel worldwide weekly.  But even the xps at 15.4&#8243; screen with 2.0 core2, 2 gig ram, 160 hd and dvd combo is only 999.<br />
I know you&#8217;ll use the arguement about included software, but i can get office still and be cheaper.  And this is just dell, i can go to frys.com and get even cheaper and still have a quality computer.<br />
And for an imac, you pay all that money for a &#8220;pretty computer&#8221;, i can build or buy a computer that&#8217;ll run circles around an imac way cheaper.</p>
<p>And for the fanboys out there, i cant wait til they do the poll asking how many apple users also own a pc or boot camp, due to the fact their apple wont do all they want it to, and how they cant use it for work or gaming.  Do that same poll on pc users and see who has a mac&#8230;.lol, why different results i bet.<br />
And the gaming response&#8230;.get a console, I have every console, 5 pcs and 3 macs, and gaming on consoles is not the same as gaming on a pc&#8230;.i.e. warcraft, and other games only on pc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KCPDX</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3346</link>
		<dc:creator>KCPDX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3346</guid>
		<description>20&quot; iMac $1199.00
http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy
Dual core
1 Gig of RAM
250 Gig HD
(Horrible Mouse)
 
Dell inspiron 518 $749.00
http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=ddcwob3&amp;c=us&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs&amp;cs=19&amp;kc=productdetails~desktop-inspiron-518
Quad Core
3 Gigs of RAM
500 Gigs of HD
 
Granted this only comes with integrated graphics and 19&quot; Monitor, but those could be upgraded to 22&quot; monitor and Radeon 3450 and the price would be only 899.00</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20&#8243; iMac $1199.00<br />
<a href="http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy" rel="nofollow">http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB323LL/A?mco=NzMyNjMy</a><br />
Dual core<br />
1 Gig of RAM<br />
250 Gig HD<br />
(Horrible Mouse)</p>
<p>Dell inspiron 518 $749.00<br />
<a href="http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=ddcwob3&amp;c=us&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs&amp;cs=19&amp;kc=productdetails~desktop-inspiron-518" rel="nofollow">http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=ddcwob3&amp;c=us&amp;l=en&amp;s=dhs&amp;cs=19&amp;kc=productdetails~desktop-inspiron-518</a><br />
Quad Core<br />
3 Gigs of RAM<br />
500 Gigs of HD</p>
<p>Granted this only comes with integrated graphics and 19&#8243; Monitor, but those could be upgraded to 22&#8243; monitor and Radeon 3450 and the price would be only 899.00</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gunslinger</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/prices-on-mac-and-windows-computers/comment-page-1/#comment-3342</link>
		<dc:creator>gunslinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1174#comment-3342</guid>
		<description>Actually I&#039;m not wrong. If you compare machines of smiler type and specs you would quickly see I&#039;m right. Compare the Imac with the Dell xps one. Both are all in one units. Look at the specs. The Dell is $1,439  the iMac is $1,499.00 , thats not much difference at all. Also lets compare the Dell 1330 notbook to the Macbook. When you configure them the same way the price is within a few bucks.

Like I said before what people are doing when they say Macs are more expensive is comparing them to some low quality garbage they get at Wal-mart. They are not the same thing no matter how badly people might want to think that. If you compare spec for spec the Mac comes out to be about on par. I can provide the links to back me up here. I&#039;m not wrong.

 Find me an all in one system with 2x to 3x the specs of an imac for about ½ the price and I&#039;ll eat every last word. You said you could. Now understand the midrange Imac has these specs 2.66ghz core 2 duo CPU, 2 gigs of RAM and a 320 gig HDD. This means your machine will have to be an all in one with 20&#039;&#039; screen at least a quad core cpu and 8 gigs of RAM with about 600gigs of HDD and all for less than $800

Now as for Vista. Yes I have issues with Vista. And I do bad mouth it every chance I get. I used Vista on my home system for almost a year. I&#039;ll be the first to admit that its gotten better with SP1. But its still not even close to XP. I use Vista daily on both customer PCs and my daughters laptop.


&quot; Quality of computer parts is almost a non issue today&quot;

Say what? I really hope you are kidding here. So all this time I have been buying Corsir ram and I could have been using the really cheap stuff in customers machines?

Now if we are going to start talking about incompatibility with software between OS releases. Lets talk about Vista shall we? Almost no software made for XP worked for Vista when it first came out. Thats a fact. 

Seems like The PC/Vista fanboy attitude might be clouding you judgments a little bit fellas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I&#8217;m not wrong. If you compare machines of smiler type and specs you would quickly see I&#8217;m right. Compare the Imac with the Dell xps one. Both are all in one units. Look at the specs. The Dell is $1,439  the iMac is $1,499.00 , thats not much difference at all. Also lets compare the Dell 1330 notbook to the Macbook. When you configure them the same way the price is within a few bucks.</p>
<p>Like I said before what people are doing when they say Macs are more expensive is comparing them to some low quality garbage they get at Wal-mart. They are not the same thing no matter how badly people might want to think that. If you compare spec for spec the Mac comes out to be about on par. I can provide the links to back me up here. I&#8217;m not wrong.</p>
<p> Find me an all in one system with 2x to 3x the specs of an imac for about ½ the price and I&#8217;ll eat every last word. You said you could. Now understand the midrange Imac has these specs 2.66ghz core 2 duo CPU, 2 gigs of RAM and a 320 gig HDD. This means your machine will have to be an all in one with 20&#8221; screen at least a quad core cpu and 8 gigs of RAM with about 600gigs of HDD and all for less than $800</p>
<p>Now as for Vista. Yes I have issues with Vista. And I do bad mouth it every chance I get. I used Vista on my home system for almost a year. I&#8217;ll be the first to admit that its gotten better with SP1. But its still not even close to XP. I use Vista daily on both customer PCs and my daughters laptop.</p>
<p>&#8221; Quality of computer parts is almost a non issue today&#8221;</p>
<p>Say what? I really hope you are kidding here. So all this time I have been buying Corsir ram and I could have been using the really cheap stuff in customers machines?</p>
<p>Now if we are going to start talking about incompatibility with software between OS releases. Lets talk about Vista shall we? Almost no software made for XP worked for Vista when it first came out. Thats a fact. </p>
<p>Seems like The PC/Vista fanboy attitude might be clouding you judgments a little bit fellas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
