Knightsman
Well-Known Member
- Reaction score
- 32
This is exactly why I really don't bother to come around very much any more. People get uppity so quickly and start running around with pitchforks. I was a daily reader / contributor and honestly now I probably log in twice a month.
Yes we all do, but not all of us handle it like you have. Bravo.
Not to start a fight or an argument, but my BS meter is pegged right now. Perhaps you can do a clean install of windows 7 on a new machine, but there is no way updates are downloaded and installed in that time. Even on fairly new and modern hardware it still takes a good hour + to download and install all the windows 7 updates. Let alone any other third party software. I'd say it takes me a good 2 hours to start from bare metal and wind up with an updated "base" installation of windows 7.
The real point here is that most hardware that was intended for windows xp is slowwww. By doing it this way, you can take a process that would easily take several hours and get it done in less than half an hour. Perhaps I personally wouldn't use the tools the OP did (and you never know, I might... just really don't see myself paying $300 to try them out) and don't love ZFS, but the article is a good guide for those who may not be familiar with the imaging methods.
And btw, im not running this process on xp age machines.
Also, you can try this process for only $40 with easeus todo backup workstation, or acronis, or any other preferred and reliable imaging software