|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
never do waste of time. Best if needed is to do a full HD integerty check - chkdsk does the job well (with parameters as per required)
Fragmented files on an older system, probably yes. On newer systems I wouldnt even bother. As others have stated I use Auslogics if really needed. Last edited by frase; 04-14-2012 at 10:41 AM. |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
on-site, start a defrag off before I leave
off-site, yes I run a defrag |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
It depends on the machine, honestly. On a Vista or above, I don't even consider it. On a pre XP machine.... actually I don't remember the last pre XP machine I worked on, but if I was working on one, I probably would, after everything else was done. XP is a 50/50, I'll check the fragmentation and if it's significant, I'll run a defrag.
This thread led me to check my own laptop, a win7 unit at least 3 years old. I've never even thought of defragging it, and I tend to add/delete/move stuff around a lot on my computers. So I checked and it was all of 2% fragmented, so no, on a win7 machine I don't even think about defragging.
__________________
An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made, in a narrow field. Niels Bohr |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
'putertutor, is defrag set to auto on your pc?
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
I do, I know in the later windows operating systems it's automatically done but it never seems to be very effective (maybe that's just vista). It also seems to take forever. I use Auslogics Disk Defrag from a flash drive (portable!) and it's soooo much quicker than the built in one; I usually leave it when I go to bed and tick the 'shutdown on completion' button (even though it only takes about 20-30mins)
__________________
put that in your pipe and grep it |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|