tankman1989
10-14-2010, 10:01 AM
I had a call yesterday for Barrister at an Estee Lauder store. They needed to have a memory upgrade on the managers machine. This was my first Barrister call and it went well. When I arrived on site I asked about the problem and realized that the original diagnosis was probably not correct. The problem was that the Back Office application was taking about 8-10 minutes to load from the server. This had been going on about a two weeks or so.
Well I installed the new memory and restarted the machine and the problem persisted. I talked to the manager a little more and figured out that the problem was either with the server or within the network somewhere. They were using and old HP server and a very old Intel 8 port hub (with the collision light on constantly). I called the Estee Lauder tech line and told them my diagnosis and said I was leaning towards the hub. He had me power off the hub and disconnect all the cat5 cables and plug them back in. After that it was back up and running like it used to!
So my first call with Barrister was a mis-diagnosis yet I still managed to resolve the problem on-site. I have done work for a few other call-out tech companies and it seems the diagnosis are wrong about 50% of the time. Is this about what any of you guys have found or is this uncommonly high?
Well I installed the new memory and restarted the machine and the problem persisted. I talked to the manager a little more and figured out that the problem was either with the server or within the network somewhere. They were using and old HP server and a very old Intel 8 port hub (with the collision light on constantly). I called the Estee Lauder tech line and told them my diagnosis and said I was leaning towards the hub. He had me power off the hub and disconnect all the cat5 cables and plug them back in. After that it was back up and running like it used to!
So my first call with Barrister was a mis-diagnosis yet I still managed to resolve the problem on-site. I have done work for a few other call-out tech companies and it seems the diagnosis are wrong about 50% of the time. Is this about what any of you guys have found or is this uncommonly high?