<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Compatibility Test for Windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.technibble.com/compatibility-test-for-windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.technibble.com/compatibility-test-for-windows-7/</link>
	<description>A Resource for Computer Repair Technicians &#38; to get PC tech support help.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:27:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Micro Niches</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/compatibility-test-for-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>Micro Niches</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1105#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>Yeah, why do they even need to make new OS&#039;s? Why don&#039;t they just provide updates to people, and then more expensive updates cost money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, why do they even need to make new OS&#8217;s? Why don&#8217;t they just provide updates to people, and then more expensive updates cost money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jm Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/compatibility-test-for-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jm Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1105#comment-2887</guid>
		<description>A compatibility tool for an OS that (theoretically) wont be released for another 18 months? I doubt they will even get close to the 2010 release date,much less get it right at that time

Sounds like the warmup for a bad Vista re-run to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A compatibility tool for an OS that (theoretically) wont be released for another 18 months? I doubt they will even get close to the 2010 release date,much less get it right at that time</p>
<p>Sounds like the warmup for a bad Vista re-run to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V</title>
		<link>http://www.technibble.com/compatibility-test-for-windows-7/comment-page-1/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 22:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technibble.com/?p=1105#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>Why the heck would anyone want to mess with this when they can&#039;t even get Vista right yet. I thought people learned their lesson.

Even if this tool says Windows 7 will work, how well will it work and will it actually still be the same as it is now when it does get released? I mean come on look how poor Vista preforms unless you go way above the minimum requirements for ram.

This is one thing I will just leave to those always have to have the new and improved products before anyone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the heck would anyone want to mess with this when they can&#8217;t even get Vista right yet. I thought people learned their lesson.</p>
<p>Even if this tool says Windows 7 will work, how well will it work and will it actually still be the same as it is now when it does get released? I mean come on look how poor Vista preforms unless you go way above the minimum requirements for ram.</p>
<p>This is one thing I will just leave to those always have to have the new and improved products before anyone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
